|
Canada's Rock to Road Magazine
November/December
2007 Issue
For a copy of the issue
that contains these articles with colour photos, click
here.
Roadbuilder
of the Year
By Andy Bateman, Engineering
Editor
Roadbuilder of the Year
is a new feature in Aggregates & Roadbuilding to recognise companies
that are making a major contribution to the development of Canada’s
road network. We are proud to nominate Peter Kiewit Sons Co. as our
first Roadbuilder of the Year and this article looks at just some of
the nation’s major roadbuilding projects, past, present and future,
involving the Kiewit organization.
Peter
Kiewit Sons Co. began as Kiewit Brothers, an Omaha, Nebraska-based masonry
contracting partnership formed by Peter and Andrew Kiewit in 1884. The
company has since grown into one of the largest employee owned companies
in North America with over 1700 US and Canada employee stockholders.
In Western Canada, the company is a leading heavy construction contractor
and, since the early 1940s, has been building projects from British
Columbia to Manitoba and the Northwest Territories. Kiewit’s Eastern
Canada District conducts its operations though Construction Kiewit Cie
and Peter Kiewit Sons Co., both subsidiaries of the Kiewit Corporation.
Kiewit Energy Canada Corp., also a subsidiary of the Kiewit Corporation,
is a major industrial contractor based in Calgary, Alberta.
Autoroute 25 extension
- Montreal, Quebec
In Quebec, Kiewit is a key member
of Concession A25 S.E.C., the consortium selected by the provincial
government to design, build, finance, operate and maintain the Autoroute
25 extension in the Montreal metropolitan area. Project director
Jacques Lacombe explains that the completed extension will connect Montreal
with Laval and so establish a direct physical link in the eastern sector
of Montreal between Laval in the North, Montreal and the South Shore
of Montreal. Goals for the extension also include improved public transportation
between Montreal and the North Shore and an alternate route for freight
transportation. The 7.2-km extension between Henri-Bourassa Boulevard
in Montreal and Autoroute 440 in Laval includes a 1.2-km toll bridge
across the Rivière des Prairies.
The design concept proposed by Concession
A25 S.E.C. consists of a four-lane highway with a six-lane cable-stayed
bridge over the Rivière des Prairies. It will also include a
multifunctional path for cyclists and pedestrians, and a reserved public
transit lane.
Concession A25 S.E.C is comprised of MIP
Quebec Holdings, L.P. and Concession A25 Funding 2 Ltd; Macquarie Bank
Ltd., Construction Kiewit Cie, Ciment St-Laurent Inc., Parsons Overseas
Company of Canada Ltd., Genivar Société en Commandite,
and Miller Paving Ltd. The partnership agreement entered into between
the province and Concession A25 S.E.C. outlines the terms of the 35-year
concession for the Autoroute 25 extension. For this project, Kiewit
will partner with Parsons to oversee the firms that will design and
build the various components required to complete the project. Kiewit’s
design and construction activities are ISO 9001-certified and its activities
related to the protection of the environment during the construction
phase of the project are ISO 14001-certified. Kiewit is among the first
construction companies in Quebec to receive an ISO 14001 certification.
Construction is scheduled to begin in March 2008 with bridge construction
on the Laval side of the Rivière des Prairies and highway construction
in Laval. The project is scheduled for completion in July 2011 with
final highway construction in Laval and Montreal.
Crowchild Trail Corridor
- Calgary, Alberta
The Crowchild Trail Corridor,
Calgary’s first design-build transportation project, was completed
in Spring 2007 after Kiewit Management Co., a subsidiary of Kiewit Corporation,
was awarded the $59 million widening, interchange, and corridor upgrade
contract. The 31.5-km long Crowchild Trail Corridor carries 60,000 vehicles
per day and connects downtown with northwestern Calgary. The scope of
work included widening a 4.2-km long corridor section from two to three
lanes in each direction, constructing three interchanges, upgrading
the utility infrastructure, erecting sound and retaining walls, and
preparing a 2.9-km section for a future light rail extension. After
completing drainage and utility upgrades, work began on three major
interchanges, which included a total of seven overpass and underpass
structures. Paving operations included over 200 000 tonnes of base and
sub-base, more than 8000 m2 of foam insulation, 45 000 tonnes of asphalt,
and 12 km of curb and gutter. Crews constructed 1400 m2 of sound attenuation
walls and placed more than 1900 m3 of concrete on twenty three separate
retaining walls. The completed project has significantly improved traffic
flow through the corridor.
Garden River Project
- Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
In 2000 the Ontario Ministry
of Transportation awarded Garden River Constructors, a joint venture
between Peter Kiewit Sons Co. and the Garden River First Nations, the
contract to build 16 km of new divided highway through the Garden River
First Nation just east of Sault Ste. Marie. Project director Gary Karjala
explains that the work included the construction of eleven bridges and
overpasses the excavation of approximately two million m3 of common
excavation, and the processing and placement of approximately one million
m3 of granular materials. The work was complicated by the presence of
sensitive clays underneath portions of the highway alignment, necessitating
the use of preload and lightweight fill to preconsolidate the subsoils
and minimize future settlement of the roadway. Preload durations of
up to five years were required and in certain areas up to 1.5 m of settlement
was observed. All of the granular materials were processed from pits
located adjacent to the highway.
Karjala adds that the project passes through
First Nations Lands and has provided an excellent opportunity for the
local community. It was completed one year ahead of schedule and is
an important improvement in the transportation infrastructure in Northern
Ontario.
York Region Rapid
Transit Viva- Phase I Quick Start – York, Ontario
The York Region Rapid Transit
Viva is the first rapid transit system of its kind in the Greater Toronto
area. The project was awarded through a custom developed, design-build
contract negotiated between a joint venture led by Peter Kiewit Sons
Co., and York Region Rapid Transit Corporation. The design-build team
developed innovative design solutions to meet the project’s technological
challenges, including real-time electronic bus arrival displays, transit
signal priority to adjust signal timing for buses behind schedule and
a computer-aided dispatch transit control center with GPS. Heritage
versions of the shelters and fare equipment were designed to preserve
the integrity of historic districts. Phase I of the first rapid transit
system had to be designed, procured, tested, commissioned and integrated
with existing transit components in less than 18 months. Valued at $72.5
million, the project was awarded the 2006 Design-Build Excellence award
(transportation over $50 million) by the Design-Build Institute of America
and the Public Works Project for 2006 award (transportation over $10
million) by the Ontario Public Works Association.
Calgary Trail, Ellerslie
Road Interchange - Edmonton, Alberta
The Calgary Trail and Ellerslie
Road interchange is situated on the south side of Edmonton, Alberta.
This $10.5 million interchange project involved the construction of
two large bridge structures and more than 6 km of roadway. Here, crews
used an innovative phased construction method to construct the first
bridge, which measured 127 m long and 27 m wide. The bridge was cast-in-place
at grade, post-tensioned and then excavated to expose the completed
structure. A second bridge, measuring 38 m by 15 m, was constructed
using a single-span precast method. The east and west retaining walls
were more than 700 m long and supported by drilled cast-in-place concrete
piles. Crews constructed more than 6 km of roadway including 65 000
m3 of excavation, 112 000 m3 of native fill, 66 000 tonnes of road base
and 23 000 tonnes of asphalt.
Yoho Bridge Replacement
and Approaches – Golden, British Columbia
This $24 million project, completed
for the British Columbia Ministry of Transportation, included replacing
the existing Yoho Bridge and rebuilding 1.5 km of roadway approaches
along the Trans-Canada Highway through the deep and narrow Kicking Horse
Canyon. The highway is a major thoroughfare, carrying more than 14,000
daily vehicles in the peak summer months. Peter Kiewit Sons Co. widened
the existing two-lane roadway to four lanes to reduce curves and minimize
grades, and replaced the single bridge with two, two-lane bridges over
the Kicking Horse River. Work also involved three mechanically stabilized
earth (MSE) walls, a 500 m long rock catchment wall with more than 300
double corrosion protection soil anchors, 25 000 m3 of rock excavation
and 80 000 m3 of common excavation. Construction of the project was
phased to allow for two lanes to be open to traffic at all times. An
innovative detour scheme eliminated a planned total closure of the Trans
Canada Highway that was anticipated during demolition of the existing
structure.
Sea-to-Sky Highway
Improvement Project - British Columbia
The Sea-to-Sky Highway Improvement
Project was first featured in the August 2006 issue of Aggregates &
Roadbuilding and, in a recent update, senior engineering manager David
Wallace reports that the project’s 230 week construction program
is on time and on budget. Kiewit is currently working over the entire
100 km project length between West Vancouver and Whistler and it is
anticipated that the majority of the heavy civil works will be completed
by the end of 2008. Paving, landscaping and other finishing activities
will carry on into 2009. Work in progress includes bridge construction,
Mechani-cally Stabilized Earth (MSE) downslope wall construction, rock
excavation, highway embankment and asphalt paving. Wallace adds that
good progress is being made on the construction of the project’s
31 bridges and over 10 km of MSE downslope retaining wall structures.
Newly completed sections include Furry
Creek to Britannia Beach (DB5N & DB6) and North Cheakamus Canyon
to Rubble Creek (DB12S), to be followed in the next few months by sections
from Britannia Beach to South Squamish and Furry Creek to North of Lions
Bay. Major bulk material quantities include over 3 million tonnes of
MSE backfill, asphalt aggregates, subbase and base aggregates, 37 000
m3 of concrete aggregates and asphalt reclamation for mixing into new
subbase.
This roadbuilding project has received
close public attention, particularly on environmental and traffic control
issues, due to its unique location and role in the 2010 Winter Olympics.
Wallace notes that the project’s Environmental Assessment Certificate
included a Table of Commitments for which accountability and compliance
has been achieved to date, despite close proximity to the Pacific Ocean
(Howe Sound), many sensitive fish bearing streams and heavy rains in
both 2006 and 2007. Together, the attention to the environment and the
systems that have been developed (compliant with EAC requirements using
an ISO 14000:2004 program) represent the leading edge in Canadian heavy
infrastructure construction environmental compliance.
Wallace adds that the highway improvement
project has very limited greenfield construction as most of the improvements
are along existing alignments. Project land acquisition is done by the
Province, with less land taken than had been originally envisaged. Historical
and archaeological features such as culturally modified trees from early
First Nations have been identified and safeguarded during the construction
process, together with extensive consultation and involvement with the
Squamish and Lil’Wat First Nations.
Measures have also been introduced to
help protect at risk and endangered wildlife species. For tailed and
red legged frogs, for instance, measures include habitat preservation,
enhancement and the installation of sub-highway crossing features. In
addition, typical fish bearing streams and salmon runs were accounted
for in the construction planning, while protection for the area’s
extensive bird population included no blasting during nesting season
and the installation of solar powered video cameras to monitor nest
activity. Environmental monitoring has been done according to Agency
requirements and Kiewit developed comprehensive training programs for
its field engineers, environment coordinators and supervisors to enhance
awareness and abilities on environmental issues.
All Work Plans, detailing how each item
of work is to be executed, included the standard safety, quality, environmental
and construction requirements. The special section on environmental
requirements was reviewed by a Kiewit staff of registered professional
biologists who would assist the field engineers and construction personnel
with training, and correct implementation of the proper measures to
mitigate adverse impacts on the environment.
On traffic control, Wallace reports that
the challenge to keep traffic moving through the construction site has
been met by careful planning and subdivision of the project into numerous
phased work areas and smaller work task increments. As a result, heavy
mobile equipment has been floated to new locations between day and night
shifts to facilitate continuous work operations throughout the highway
corridor. A good safety record has been maintained despite the hazards
of steep terrain and moving traffic, again thanks to work planning and
completion of difficult work elements during the day with maximum light
conditions and keeping the simpler tasks for night to maximise the use
of regularly scheduled traffic closures.
Kiewit trained and developed its own traffic
engineering and management capabilities so that this group would be
closely connected to the design and construction groups. The company
also made use of Intelligent Traffic Systems providing lane counts,
traffic density and calculated travel times compared to established
baselines, as well as remotely controlled variable traffic message signs.
In addition to these measures, the traffic
control supervisors and manager received specialized training to deal
with the particular nature of working in the mountainous Sea-to-Sky
corridor. For the travelling public, this collective effort has paid
off with actual traffic closures only about 60 per cent of the anticipated
number as well as a predictable closure schedule to assist commuters.
The sea-to-sky project is a public-private-partnership
(P3) availability style project and under this approach payment by the
province for ten payment sections begins as each is substantially completed
and ready to carry traffic. According to Wallace, benefits of this project
approach include a construction period some three years shorter than
a traditional bid-build delivery method.
The extensive list of mobile equipment
involved in the project has included at least 350 items and some $52
million worth of new equipment. Major pieces of mobile equipment include
six Caterpillar dozers (D3C, two D6R XLs, two D8Ts and D9R DS), a Caterpillar
426B and two John Deere 710Gs backhoe/loaders, two Caterpillar graders
(14G and 14H), 13 Caterpillar excavators (225CL, 320B, 330B, three 450C
LCs, four 330CLs, 330C LC, 365CL and 385CL), a John Deere 135C RTS excavator,
a Komatsu PC1250LC-7 excavator, two Ingersoll-Rand SD150D compactors,
five Caterpillar compactors (CP323C, CP563D, CS323C, CS563E, CS583E),
a Dynapac CA151D compactor, a Link-Belt HC-218 and three Grove (RT-745
RT-750, TTS870B) mobile cranes, 17 articulated trucks (five Volvo A35Ds
and four each of Caterpillar 730, 735 and 740 models), four Caterpillar
769D rigid frame haulers, an Ingersoll-Rand ECM -350 air track drill,
ten Sandvik drills (two 550 Tiger drills and eight Ranger 800 drills),
three Traxxon excavator mounted hydraulic drills on a Caterpillar 330
carrier, three Ford 8000 tankers, 16 Kenworth tri-drive trucks complete
with pups, five Freightliner International 7400 SBA trucks, sixteen
tridem pony trailers and 175 Ford light trucks, SUV’s and cars.
In addition, rental equipment has included
nine John Deere excavators (135, 200, 225, 330 and 450 models), three
Komatsu excavators (PC200, PC-78 MR6 and PC300LL), as well as nine articulated
trucks; a Komatsu HM300, two Caterpillar 735s and six Volvo A30s.
Portable material plants dedicated to
the job include Erie Strayer, Ross and CON-E-CO dry batch concrete plants,
while the Raynier quarry is home to the Astec asphalt plant of BA Blacktop.
Aggregate processing plants includes portable Pioneer track jaw and
Terex track jaw crushers, in addition to aggregate processing at Raynier,
Garibaldi and a subcontractor’s plant washing concrete aggregates.
By any measure, the Sea-to-Sky Highway Improvement Project is one of
Canada’s outstanding roadbuilding projects.
Other projects
Turning to other projects in
Kiewit’s portfolio, Wallace notes that work is well underway on
the $175 million Pitt River cable stayed bridge project between Port
Coquitlam and Pitt Meadows in B.C. while Kiewit was also recently awarded
a $185 million project in Edmonton AB for the 23rd St. At the time of
writing, a decision was pending on the Coast Meridian CPR Overpass Project
in Coquitlam B.C. valued at over $100 million. Still in B.C., Kiewit
is also part of the ConnectBC development group putting together the
RFP response to the Province for the $1.7 billion (includes $400 million
of property) Port Mann / Highway 1 widening project for construction
between 2009 and 2013. This is a 40-year tolling concession with one
point of tolling on the Port Mann Bridge.
Overall, Kiewit’s project approach
demonstrates an ongoing commitment to innovative engineering, safety,
environmental awareness and efficient project delivery.
Back to
top
Canada's
first perpetual pavement built to last
By Andy Bateman, Engineering
Editor
Billed
as Canada’s first highway to have been designed and completed
as a perpetual pavement, Ontario’s Red Hill Valley Parkway incorporates
the latest thinking in durable pavement design.
Popularly
known as the Red Hill Creek Expressway and valued at over $400 million,
the 7.5-km long, four-lane Red Hill Valley Parkway runs south of downtown
Hamilton to connect the Lincoln M. Alexander Parkway with the Queen
Elizabeth Way (QEW). After a long and controversial development history
spanning two decades and several changes of government, the new freeway
is expected to be open to traffic in November 2007, with remaining works
such as noise mitigation scheduled for completion between 2008 and 2012.
For the owner, The City of Hamilton, the project represents a practical
application of the concept of perpetual pavement sustainability. The
Parkway has certainly been designed and built to last. Its structures
have a design life of 100 years, while the pavement itself has a design
life of 50 years with periodic resurfacing at intervals of 15 to 20
years. (See sidebar on Perpetual Pavements.)
The substantial perpetual pavement cross
section includes two granular and four asphalt layers, generally starting
with Granular B and Granular A lifts of 420 mm and 100 mm respectively.
These are followed by an 80 mm thick layer of asphalt-rich mix known
as Rich Bottom Mix (RBM). In this case, the RBM is a Superpave SP19
mix with 0.5 per cent additional asphalt cement and is designed to protect
against the initiation of load induced fatigue (bottom-up) cracking.
Above the RBM, a 70 mm lower binder layer of SP 25 and a 50 mm upper
binder layer of SP19 complete the permanent structural portion of the
pavement and provide excellent rut resistance. Finally, the pavement’s
durable surface course is a 40 mm layer of SMA 12.5 to provide superior
rutting resistance, fatigue endurance, durability and improved skid
resistance, as well as some noise reduction when compared with conventional
hot-mix asphalt mixes.
Dufferin Construction Company won the
mainline paving contract PW-06-243 RHV last year with a bid of $30.3
million. Work extended from the Mud St. Interchange to the QEW Interchange
and included the placing of granular, hot mix paving, curb and gutter,
barriers, electrical, structures, illumination, signage, restoration
of recreational features and some landscaping. Bulk asphalt mix quantities
included 42 000 tonnes of RBM, 36 000 tonnes of SP25, 39 000 tonnes
of SP 19, 9500 tonnes of SP12.5 and 16 000 tonnes of SMA. Paving began
in May 2007 and was completed on the highway by the end of August 2007.
James Wharrie, project engineer for Dufferin
Construction, explains that the pavement sections for ramps and shoulders
are somewhat different to the mainline itself. Ramps still have the
four asphalt layers for their full width, but with a 40 mm lift of SP12.5FC2
replacing the SMA. The mainline shoulders have two lifts of asphalt
with a 50 mm lift of SP19 and a 40 mm surface lift of HL3 HS.
Wharrie adds that, during site operations,
most of the hot mix asphalt for the contract was supplied from the company’s
portable CMI plant set up at Dartnell Rd. On site, Dufferin’s
paving train included a Roadtec SB2500 Shuttle Buggy, Caterpillar AP-1055C
and AP-655C pavers, with both pavers fitted with hoppers and usually
working in echelon. For the most mixes, the compaction set up included
a Bomag BW205 compactor in the breakdown position with a Caterpillar
CB634D in support and also making finishing passes as required. A Dynapac
CP271 pneumatic machine worked in the secondary position.
This compaction set up worked well most
of the time to achieve target compaction densities, including the 97
per cent density of the RBM. The exception was the SMA due to rapid
cooling of the open graded mix. Wharrie explains: “the SMA mix
was produced at 165OC and we typically found that it had already cooled
to 125OC behind the paver screed. Only 10 m behind the paver, the mix
temperature had dropped a further 10OC to 115OC, with further cooling
of about 10OC for every additional 10 m from the paver. This meant that
our compactors had to get on the mat right away. We found that four
compactors, all steel drum, were about the limit we could place on the
mat at any one time without undue congestion. The SMA compaction fleet
included the Bomag BW205 as well as two Caterpillar CB634D’s and
one CB534D. Even with this compaction fleet, the overall pace of the
paving train was set by the compaction process when paving SMA.”
The pavement on the new freeway incorporates
sophisticated performance and monitoring systems. In the driving (slow)
northbound lane, performance sensors will measure pressure and moisture
content in the subgrade, temperatures in all pavement lifts and both
longitudinal and transverse horizontal strains in various lifts. In
the northbound and southbound lanes, sensors and loops of a weight in
motion system will allow traffic count, and the monitoring or traffic
speed, wheel loads as well as stresses applied to the pavement.
Crediting individuals on a project of
this size is always risky, but most would agree that Gary Moore, Director
of Engineering for the City of Hamilton has been a prime mover of the
project and instrumental in turning concept into reality. Dr. Ludomir
Uzarowski, pavement and materials specialist with Golder Associates,
has also been closely involved, completing the project’s feasibility
study, perpetual pavement design and developing its asphalt paving specifications.
Among the Dufferin Construction team, Peter Gamble, plant equipment
and technology manager and David Hainer, project superintendent, are
recognised for their significant contributions to a successful project.
Back
to top
The
Red Hill Valley Parkway - A perpetual pavement
The
City of Hamilton decided that, “given the projected traffic volumes
(which will be as high as 100,000 vehicles per day), the conventional
wisdom of designing a deep strength pavement for a 20-year life may
not be acceptable. The advanced asphalt technology and materials used
in the perpetual pavement design will allow the pavement structure to
last 50 years with only periodic surface course replacements and without
any major pavement rehabilitation. The associated benefits of delivering
a highly durable and safe pavement surface and avoiding major shut-downs
of the expressway (the surface course replacements can be completed
during single lane closures at night), are in keeping with the City’s
desire to be a leader in the application of sustainable design solutions
for public infrastructure.”
The
paper also includes details of a Life Cycle Costing Analysis (LCCA),
which compares the cost of a perpetual pavement design for the mainline
to a conventional deep strength asphalt pavement alternative. The analysis
concluded that the perpetual pavement offers net savings of about $1.5
million over the 50 year period. Expressed in present worth, the $1.5
million higher initial construction costs of the perpetual pavement
are more than offset by some $3 million of future savings in maintenance
and rehabilitation costs as well as reduced user delay costs:
Later
in the paper, further analysis estimates that the perpetual pavement
will also use less construction materials: “It is anticipated
that over the 50-year analysis period, the perpetual pavement will require
about 30 000 tonnes less hot-mix asphalt, 22 000 tonnes less granular
base and 95 000 tonnes less granular subbase material:
The
paper concludes, among other things, that “better materials and
improved analytical techniques now allow asphalt pavements to be designed
to last 50 or more years. These long lasting (perpetual) asphalt pavements
have lower impact on the environment over their entire service lives
in terms of use of materials, energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions,
and impact on road users and on local neighbourhoods.”
Extracts
from Sustainable Pavements – Making The Case For Longer Design
Lives For Flexible Pavements by Michael Maher, Ph.D., P.Eng. Principal,
Golder Associates Ltd., Ludomir Uzarowski, (then) M.Sc., P.Eng. Associate,
Golder Associates Ltd., Gary Moore, P.Eng. Manager, Design and Construction,
Red Hill Valley Project, City of Hamilton and Vince Aurilio, P.Eng.
Ontario District Representative for Bitumar Inc.

Back
to top
Warm
asphalt gains traction
Garth
St. in Hamilton, is one of the city’s principal four lane routes
and, with northbound and southbound lanes separated by a median, provided
city engineers an ideal opportunity to compare the long-term field performance
of hot and warm asphalt mixtures. The southbound lanes were resurfaced
with hot mix asphalt, while the northbound lanes were resurfaced with
warm mix asphalt utilising one of four warm asphalt technologies currently
in development in North America. Evotherm is a chemical additive package
used at 0.5 per cent to 1.5 per cent by weight of asphalt and delivered
as a high residue emulsion. Benefits of this technology are said to
include a 50 per cent reduction in fuel consumption together with a
decrease in plant and jobsite emissions by 40 to 60 per cent compared
to a hot mix asphalt control mix.
Generally speaking, warm mix asphalt can
be produced, hauled and paved with existing equipment. In this case,
paving contractor King Paving & Materials, a division of KPM Industries
Ltd., produced the warm asphalt for the job using the company’s
Cedarapids 2.7-tonne capacity batch plant. The asphalt emulsion for
the warm mix was pumped directly into the plant’s pug mill from
an emulsion tanker and the resulting mixture shipped 20 km to site in
King’s fleet of Flow Boy live bottom trailers. On site, the mixture
was fed directly to a pair of Barber Greene BG-245 pavers working in
echelon and compacted by a Bomag fleet including two BW164AD dual steel
drum units and a BW11R rubber tired machine. Site weather conditions
were good with no rain and temperatures in the mid-20°C for the
two-day paving job.
King Paving’s vice president of
operations John Hutter points out that the cooler temperatures involved
in the warm mix production process save energy in both aggregate drying
and oil heating. At King’s plant, the exit temperature of the
aggregates from the dryer was 105°C compared to 165°C for the
hot mix. In addition, the emulsion was maintained at a temperature of
90°C, also some 60°C cooler than the typical 150°C storage
temperature for hot mix asphalt cement. Hutter does add a note of caution
with respect to warm mix asphalt production and placement. At the plant,
a considerable amount of steam is generated in the pug mill when the
hot aggregate makes contact with the asphalt emulsion. This steam can
mix with airborne dust, forming a cake that can block valves and gates.
To avoid this situation, operators should ensure the mill is well vented
before mixing begins. On site, paving crews report that handwork with
the more tacky warm mix is somewhat harder than a conventional mix.
Still on site, the mixture was also found to pick up a little on rollers,
although this was easily remedied by the addition of soap to the roller
water.
Keith Davidson, director of technical
services for McAsphalt Industries, explains that the mix used for Garth
St.’s two southbound lanes were paved utilising a SP 12.5FC1 mixture
containing five per cent PGAC 64-28 asphalt cement. The two northbound
lanes were paved with the same mix apart from the Evotherm 64-28 emulsion,
with the asphalt emulsion content increased to seven per cent to reflect
the 30 per cent water content of the emulsion. Both mixes utilised 50
per cent HL1 steel slag and 50 per cent high stability sand from the
Dundas quarry of Lafarge Canada Inc. The Garth St. job is one of seven
warm asphalt projects involving McAsphalt Industries in 2007, for a
total of eleven since the first was completed in 2005. Experience to
date indicates energy cost savings of at least 35-40 per cent for gas
or oil fired plants and these numbers seem to be consistent with the
results of perhaps 50 projects that have now been completed globally.
Warm
mix asphalt technology
Several
warm mix technologies are available with the common goal of significantly
reducing the temperatures at which asphalt is produced and placed.
The principal benefits claimed for warm mix asphalt include significant
energy savings and reduced emissions, all achieved without comprising
finished product quality. Warm asphalt technologies currently
in development in North America include Evotherm, WAM-Foam, Aspha-Min,
and Sasobit.
The Evotherm system is a chemical
additive package delivered as a high residue emulsion. WAM-Foam
(Warm Asphalt Mix Foam) takes a different approach with a two-component
binder system introducing a soft binder and hard foamed binder
at different stages during plant production. Aspha-Min is a synthetic
zeolite (Sodium Aluminum Silicate) added during mixing at the
plant to create a foaming effect in the binder. Sasobit is an
organic additive, otherwise known as a Fischer-Tropsch (FT) paraffin
wax and is used improve asphalt flow. |
According to supplier MeadWestvaco, the
Evotherm additive significantly reduces temperatures at which asphalt
pavements are produced and applied without compromising the durability
of the paving material. Company data adds that the additive can be used
in any traditional hot mix application, from binder course to surface
course, with the asphalt laid at temperatures 50-75°C lower than
the equivalent hot mix asphalt mixture. The range of applications is
said to include surface, binder, polymer-modified and rap mixes, as
well as stiffer mixes, thin lift and ultra thin lift mixes, stone-mastic
asphalt (SMA) mixes, open-graded friction courses and cooler weather
mixes, all while utilising existing HMA job mix formulas.
The reduction in temperature is said to extend haul distances and so
allow the service area of an asphalt plant to increase without compromising
quality. In addition, the new technology does not require a change in
equipment and can be used in existing plants. Claimed advantages of
Evotherm include energy savings and decreased emissions at the hot-mix
plant, no odour, increased throughput, reduced dust generation, less
plant wear, reduced job site fumes, quicker return to traffic, longer
binder life and an extended operating season.
The data also compares stack emissions
at the asphalt plant for an Evotherm mix at 93°C to a HMA control
mix at 154°C, with the HMA emissions normalised to 100 per cent.
This data indicates that carbon dioxide emissions are reduced by 46
per cent, carbon monoxide by 63 per cent, sulphur dioxide by 81 per
cent, nitrogen oxides by 58 per cent and total particulate matter (TPM)
by 34 per cent, all at the same time as fuel consumption is reduced
by 55 per cent. An additional analysis for site fume emissions indicates
that total organics are reduced by 41 per cent while benzene solubles
are below detectable limits.
Warm
mix asphalt extends pavement service life
While
energy and emissions reduction for warm mix asphalt have stolen
the headlines, an equally significant aspect of its use is under
close scrutiny: the ability to extend asphalt service life. Keith
Davidson, director of technical services for McAsphalt Industries
explains: “All asphalt cements age harden during the production
process as a result of being heated. However, we have found that
warm asphalt mixtures age harden significantly less during production
compared to a conventional hot mix asphalt due to the lower mixing
temperatures. Measured in terms of penetration, a 100 pen asphalt
cement utilised in hot mix might drop to about 65 pen measured
straight out of the production plant, while the same asphalt cement
may still have a penetration of 85 pen as part of a warm asphalt
mixture.
“As a result, the warm asphalt is significantly ‘younger’
the day it goes into service with a commensurate increase in service
life. Work is still ongoing to evaluate the impact of this reduced
age hardening, but, all other things being equal, it is likely
that the service life of a warm asphalt mat will be some three
to five years longer than the equivalent hot mix asphalt mat.
“As you might expect, we are very interested in how this
service life increase will impact on any pavement life cycle cost
(LCC) analysis used to compare alternative pavement construction
methods. Even then, there are intangible benefits such as emission
reductions that cannot be measured in purely dollar terms. Ideally,
these additional benefits will be taken into account when weighing
the overall merits of any warm asphalt system.” |
Back
to top
Screen
media provides fine screening solution, boosts productivity
An
Ontario lime producer reports increased screening efficiency and productivity
after installing flexible screens in a challenging application.
Leke
Fadiya is Mine Engineer at the Carmeuse Lime Beachville operation near
Ingersoll, Ont. Fadiya explains that part of the production process
at Beachville involves the separation of crushed limestone to provide
feed material for the operation’s kiln and pulverised stone plants.
Granular 22 mm minus material is screened into three sizes: 22 mm x
13 mm, minus 13 mm x 6.3 mm and minus 6.3 mm. The 22 mm x 13 mm is used
as kiln feed while the minus 6.3 mm is utilised as feed for the operation’s
pulverised stone plant and also as feed for AG75 product. Occasionally,
the minus 13 mm x 6.3 mm fraction is blended back into the pulverised
stone feed to improve material flow.
Under normal operating conditions, the
22 mm minus feed material is fed at a total rate of 300 tonnes/h to
a pair of 5x14 double- deck screens. These screens were previously fitted
with slotted woven wire screen cloths having 9.5 mm x 76 mm and 4.8
mm x 76 mm openings on the top and bottom decks respectively. With that
screen media set up, screening efficiency was reasonable in dry or very
cold weather, but rapidly deteriorated when the feed material was wet
due to rain or snow. The bottom deck frequently became blinded, resulting
in carry over of 6.3 mm minus material into the 13 mm x 6.3 mm
fraction. In extreme situations, both top and bottom decks became blinded
and little feed material separation occurred at all, so risking contamination
of the kiln feed with minus 13 mm x 0 material.
In these situations, plant operators often
had little choice but to stop the screening operation and attempt to
manually scrape or lever off the caked material that had built up on
the screen cloths. Operators even resorted to the use of propane torches
to dry and remove wet material, but that process provided only temporary
improvements and the combined effects of impact and local heat did nothing
for screen life. Maintenance records retrieved by the reliability engineer
at Carmeuse, Arsenio Flora, show that broken screen cloths were a regular
event, necessitating replacement as often as six times a year.
To address this situation, Flex-Mat “S”
type screen cloths were installed on the upper and lower decks of one
of the 5x14 screens in 2006, with the existing slotted cloths left in
place on the other screen for comparison purposes. Fadiya reports an
immediate improvement in screening efficiency and the installation of
the Flex-Mat screen cloths on the second screen soon afterwards. For
this application, each side tensioned Flex Mat screen cloth panel is
1.486 m wide and 1.422 m long for a total of three panels in the 4.267
m long deck. The Flex-Mat screens have been in service for sixteen months,
with Fadiya reporting significantly improved productivity and no sizing,
maintenance or repair issues to date.
According to manufacturer Major Wire Industries
Ltd., the Flex-Mat “S” type cloths utilised in this application
are designed to remove fines for cleaner retained product. One of the
key differences between all Flex-Mat designs and conventional woven
screen media designs is the absence of cross wires. A special formulation
of polyurethane bonded with individual screen wires eliminates the need
for traditional woven cross wires, thereby eliminating high spots inherent
in a woven design and the consequent opportunity for premature failure
due to high spot wear. Polyurethane strips, centered on each screen
deck crown bar support, allow individual wires to vibrate independently
at different frequencies, preventing material from accumulating between
wires as it typically does with woven wire.
The current range of Flex-Mat screens
is designated Flex-Mat 3 as the third generation in product development,
with each type targeting different screening challenges. The Series
D has a diamond pattern and is designed for precise sizing of passing
material and most standard applications. In this pattern, crimped individual
wires present diamond-shaped openings to the feed material, with available
size opening ranging from 1.5 mm to 101.6 mm. The Series S has a wave
pattern to remove fines, with size openings in this design ranging from
1.5 mm to 50.8 mm. Additional applications for the Series S are said
to include replacement of any existing slotted screens and also those
situations where specification product is required utilising natural
round material. The Series T heavy-duty screen has a triangular pattern
for larger sizes and is reinforced for heavy loads or high impact materials.
Its use is recommended when 25 per cent of material is four or more
times larger than screen cloth openings and its size openings range
from 2.0 mm to 50.8 mm.
Back
to top
Hard
markers give loaders high marks
Aggregates & Roadbuilding
recently visited some aggregate operations to obtain operator feedback
on one manufacturer’s wheel loaders with generally positive results.
While
matching a new piece of mobile equipment to its intended application
is a relatively straightforward exercise, pleasing its operators is
a much tougher job.
Mobile equipment manufacturers make many
claims for their products and potential owners are faced with a dizzying
array of machine sizes, options and performance promises. Conspicuous
by its absence however, is any guarantee that any particular machine
will be well received by its operators. Those same operators are not
generally bashful about voicing their opinions, favourable or otherwise,
knowing that a machine’s strengths and weaknesses will become
all too familiar over thousands of hours of operation. Fortunately,
most equipment manufacturers and owners recognise the importance of
this feedback and carefully consider operator viewpoints when building
or buying mobile equipment.
To see the loaders in action, Aggregates
& Roadbuilding visited Ontario producers Tri City Materials and
St Marys CBM. Tri City Materials Ltd., named after the three Ontario
cities of Waterloo, Kitchener and Cambridge, has five sand and gravel
operations and a ready mix division with two concrete plants. The far
larger St. Marys CBM, the building materials division of St. Marys Cement
Inc., is a major aggregate producer with twelve sand and gravel operations
and quarries, plus 40 ready mix concrete plants. St Mary’s Cement
is in turn part of Votorantim Cimentos, an international cement manufacturer
based in Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Tri City Materials is currently operating
three John Deere 844J wheel loaders and one 824J machine, while a new
544J loader has gone into service with Tri City Ready Mix Ltd. The John
Deere 844J at the St Marys CBM David Pit is reportedly the company’s
first John Deere loader, although there are other Deere products in
the mobile fleet.
Operators at both companies gave positive
feedback on these loaders, noting smooth shifting, fast hoist speeds,
good power under load and good visibility, while minor grumbles included
varying bucket roll position. The 844J wheel loader is a relatively
new arrival on the large loader scene having first been available in
November 2005 and, at least based on these comments, seems to have a
bright future.
At Tri City Material’s Kitchener
pit, a John Deere 824J wheel loader with a standard 4.59 m3 bucket was
on load and carry duty feeding granular base material to an aggregate
screening and washing set up. This loader maintained a feed rate of
300 tonnes/h to the wash plant and appeared well matched to the duty,
with steady wash plant production and little waiting time during the
load and dump cycle. In the same pit, one of Tri City Materials larger
loaders, a John Deere 844J equipped with a standard 5.55 m3 bucket,
was on split duty loading highway trucks and handling bulk materials
within the pit. Operations manager Greg Ramseyer pointed out that this
machine was also well matched to its duty, loading a tri-axle truck
in two passes or a tractor trailer unit in five passes. On the same
day at Tri City Materials’ Amulree pit, one of the company’s
other 844J wheel loaders was feeding pit run to a Powerscreen Warrior
1800 screen plant. This harder duty cycle involved loading pit run containing
pieces up to 600 mm and hauling it some 150 m. Despite the longer haul
and poor weather, this loader and screen duo was well-matched and making
three products from the pit run at a reasonable rate.
At the David pit of St Marys CBM near
Cambridge Ont., equipment manager Howard Wheeler explained that the
John Deere 844J wheel loader based here is dedicated to loading highway
trucks from product stockpiles. For this duty, the loader has been fitted
with Deere’s 6.2 m3 bucket, the largest rated bucket available
for this machine. Operator Sam Carrothers reports that this bucket enables
the 884J to load about 10 tonnes of sand or about 9.5 tonnes of coarse
aggregate with each pass, depending on the moisture content of the material.
Most of the time Carrothers utilises the loader’s steering wheel,
more from familiarity as much as anything else, but has occasionally
used the joystick control and found it to be user friendly and intuitive.
The loader is reportedly delivering fast cycle times, thanks to a combination
of smooth shifting, fast bucket hoist speeds and good power availability,
especially when travelling loaded up a steep grade. Such situations
can occur when the loader is travelling uphill to a waiting truck or
driving up the feed hopper ramp of a processing plant.
Although in a different place at different
times, the feedback from Tri City operators Wes Esbaugh and Marv Stere
was very similar. Here, favourable comments were made with respect to
the loader’s high breakout force and fast bucket hoist rate. Characteristics
such as the loader’s ability to travel loaded up a steep grade,
smooth shifting and easy to use joystick control were likewise noted
here.
Turning to options and accessories chosen
by the machine’s owners, the general purpose buckets on Tri City’s
loaders have several ground engaging tools including bolt on edges,
teeth and segments as well as the John Deere Jagz system. Manufacturer’s
literature describes Jagz as a versatile angled dovetail design from
which users can custom build a wear surface on loader buckets or scraper
bowls. It is said to be guaranteed against breakage, self-sharpening,
reversible and interchangeable and will fit any model or make of loader.
The St Marys CBM loader is equipped with
a Microload 310 loader scale to facilitate accurate loading and minimise
overloads. It is routinely used to make small adjustments to the last
bucket load, with material being trickled off to ensure that the truck
is loaded as closely as possible to its target payload. Information
from scale manufacturer Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., adds that the
scale can be set to target mode which counts down as loading progresses,
or totalising mode which maintains a running total on the screen for
use in applications such as hopper or ship loading. Load records are
stored on cartridges for periodic data retrieval and analysis if required.
In terms of accuracy, the manufacturer claims typical static accuracy
of plus or minus one per cent of full load while dynamic accuracy (weighing
with the machine on the move) is rated at plus or minus 1.5 per cent
of the local reference scale.
The 844J loader has a net rated power
of 330 hp at the rated engine speed of 2100 rpm. There are four forward
speed ranges and three reverse speed ranges with maximum speeds of 37.7
and 27.4 km/h respectively. The bucket range is 4.6 - 6.2 m3. Specifications
based on the standard bucket size of 5.55 m3 with no counterweight indicate
straight and full turn tipping loads of 24.1 tonnes and 20.8 tonnes.
Dump clearance at 45 degrees is 3.36 m and the loader’s operating
weight is 31 tonnes.
The 824J Z-Bar wheel loader has net rated
power of 275 hp at 2000 rpm. It also has four forward speed ranges and
three reverse speed ranges with maximum speeds of 39.4 and 31.1 km/h
respectively. The bucket range is 4.4 - 5.2 m3. Its specifications,
based on the standard bucket size of 4.59 m3 with no counterweight,
indicate straight and full turn tipping loads of 19.3 tonnes and 16.2
tonnes. Dump clearance at 45 degrees is 3.23 m and the 824J’s
operating weight is 26 tonnes.
Back to
top
Fuel
efficiency pays for loader owner
Residents
and race fans in the Kanata and Carp area west of Ottawa will most likely
associate Rick Rump with the Capital City Speedway, where Rump is a
regular competitor in the late model class. Less well known perhaps
is the fact that Rump is also the principal of Rick Rump Excavation,
an established topsoil business based in Carp.
Each year, some 25 000 m3 of dredged sand
is mixed with 60 000 m3 of screened top soil at Rump’s Carp Road
pit, with some 90 per cent of production going to commercial landscapers.
Topsoil screening is completed by a Roto-Screen
RS-65 trommel screen, while Rump’s excavation and dirtmoving equipment
fleet includes a Caterpillar 330BL excavator, 215LC excavator, D7 dozer
and John Deere 450 dozer. Trommel feeding, materials handling and truck
loading are completed by a Liebherr L544 2+2 wheel loader which replaced
a competitor’s machine of similar size. Rump has found that the
fuel efficiency of the L544 2+2 compares favourably to its predecessor
and makes a measurable contribution to the bottom line.
Daily loader duties include sand load
and carry, maintaining topsoil feed to a portable trommel screen and
loading product onto a fleet of International tri-axle highway trucks.
In this application, Rump reports that the L544 2+2 consumes an average
of 150 litres of diesel fuel during each 10-hour shift, or 80 litres
less than the 230 litres consumed by the previous machine. With coloured
diesel currently running at about 80 cents/litre, the L544’s fuel
efficiency translates into monthly cost savings of about $1,300 or nearly
$9,000 over the business’s typical seven month operating season.
Back to
top
Liebherr
fuel test parameters
Manufacturer’s
literature for the Liebherr range of wheel loaders includes a description
of the company’s “Norm Test”, or “Standard Consumption
Test”. Said to be easy to reproduce and practical, the test provides
a way of comparing the fuel consumption of wheel loaders in a controlled
working cycle: “conducted on customer’s premises, the customer
determines the number of loading cycles than can be completed with 5
litres of diesel fuel. Material is taken from pile A and carried over
a distance of 20 m to pile B. Discharge at point B should take place
from a height of 2.5 m and the time required for each complete working
cycle should be 35 seconds. The working cycle is repeated until the
five litres of fuel in the external measuring tank have been used up.
The loader’s fuel consumption in litres per hour is calculated
by dividing the number 400 by the number of loading cycles completed
during the test.”
For the L544 2+2 loader with a standard
3.0 m3 capacity bucket, the result of the Norm Test indicates fuel consumption
of 11.4 litres/h, equivalent to 2.6 litres per 100 tonnes of material
moved For the Liebherr L550 2+2, successor machine to the L544 2+2,
the Norm Test indicates slightly higher fuel consumption of 12.9 litres/h
but the same productivity of 2.6 litres per 100 tonnes of material moved.
This apparent anomaly is explained by the larger 3.2 m3 loading
bucket capacity of the L550 compared to the 3.0 m3 loading bucket capacity
on the L544. In other words, the two machines consume about the same
amount of fuel to do the same amount of work, as the greater payload
of the L550 offsets its slightly higher fuel consumption.
Another Liebherr analysis compares the
fuel consumption of its loaders to competitor’s machines in the
same class. In the case of the L550, the average fuel consumption of
competitor’s machines is quoted at 16.7 litres/h. The L550 therefore
uses 3.8 fewer litres/h, and, based on a diesel price of $0.90/litre
and 2000 operating hours per year, will save its owner $6,840 each year
in fuel costs relative to competitor’s machines performing the
same duty. The analysis then considers these fuel cost savings, totalling
$34,200 over five years of operation, as an offset to the L550’s
list price of $230,000 for a “Comparative Cost” of $195,800.
Similar calculations are made for other
wheel loaders in the Liebherr range. According to this analysis, five-year
fuel cost savings range from $36,000 for the L538 up to $68,400 for
the L586 loader. The analysis adds that “further operating cost
savings can be expected from reduced brake wear and tire wear as the
loader is constantly breaking hydraulically, rendering the service brake
as a secondary function. The standard traction control also allows the
operator to adjust for various working surfaces, thereby significantly
reducing stress and wear probabilities on tires. These reductions in
brake and tire wear could result in additional savings of $40,000 over
the initial five year period.”
Back to
top
November-December
2007 issue
Aggregates
and Roadbuilding Magazine
4999 St Catherine Street West.
Suite 315
Westmount, Quebec H3Z 1T3
Tel: (514) 487-9868 Fax: (514) 487-9276
EMail: rocktoroad@sympatico.ca
|